HomePublicationsOpen Access SeriesThe SoTL Guide Chapter 7: Designing Your SoTL InquiryDownload Chapter Book MenuThe SoTL Guide ChaptersIntroductionChapter 1Chapter 2Chapter 3Chapter 5Chapter 6Chapter 7Chapter 8Chapter 9Chapter 10Chapter 11Chapter 12Chapter 4About the Authors Book Resources Reviews Download BookOpen Access PDFdoi.org/10.36284/celelon.oa10ISBN: 978-1-64317-568-3November 3, 20257.2 MBMetrics: 6268 views | 1494 downloadsBuy in PrintISBN: 978-1-64317-567-6EPUB ISBN: 978-1-64317-569-0 This chapter explores design of SoTL inquiries through two of Pat Hutchings’s questions: What is? and What works? The chapter shows that most SoTL projects can be thoughtfully organized around these designs without requiring methodological conformity. Picking up a theme from earlier in the book, this chapter describes SoTL as a disciplinary “trading zone.” The chapter encourages openness to diverse epistemologies—from thick, qualitative description to controlled comparisons—while interrogating one’s own assumptions about research methodologies. The What is? section illustrates how descriptive studies generate meaningful accounts of student learning, using examples that analyze reflection in engineering, trace writing development across courses, and examine emotional students’ responses to feedback in multiple countries. The What works? section highlights comparative designs testing effectiveness, such as how active-learning classrooms influence affective engagement and how a metacognitive program correlates with GPA gains beyond motivation. For both types of question, the chapter provides parallel step-by-step design guides. The chapter concludes by encouraging readers to choose designs that fit their own context and professional training. Related Book Resources Worksheet: Designing Your Inquiry [PDF][Microsoft Word] Video: Three faculty describe diverse examples of SoTL projects (5:00), produced by the Center for Engaged Learning [Video] Discussion QuestionsWe invite you to explore these questions in individual reflection or collegial conversation. Do you and your disciplinary peers tend to design research projects that look more like what is? or what works? What do you see as the strengths, and the weaknesses, of that kind of SoTL question? Try reorienting your inquiry with a different starting question—if your question currently is “What works?” then try “What is?” or “What if?” What do you notice about your question—and your inquiry—when you start with a different kind of question? Share: