HomeConferences & Think Tanks2024 Conference on Engaged Learning Schedule Share: Section NavigationSkip section navigationIn this section2024 Conference on Engaged Learning Keynote Speakers Schedule Conference Location Registration Conference Grant Lodging Speaker Guidelines Call for Proposals All times are listed in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). Sunday, July 14 1:30 PM Registration Opens Registration will open at 1:30 PM in the East Lobby of Moseley Center. Check your email on Sunday for a copy of the schedule with room assignments. Join a pre-conference workshop at 2:00 PM. The workshop is included in your conference registration. 2:00 – 5:00 PM Pre-Conference Workshop Elevating Student Voice in Enhancing Quality Work Integrated Learning Experiences, facilitated by Michelle Eady (University of Wollongong, Australia), David Drewery (University of Waterloo, Canada), Wincy Li (Toronto Metropolitan University, Canada), and Monica Burney (Elon University) In this interactive, collaborative and creative workshop, we will share the creation of Reflections of Quality (RoQ) WIL framework, how it aligns with Bronfenbrenner’s (1979) seminal work, and what the literature tells us about student voice in quality WIL experiences. We present our initial findings collected from globally and disciplinary diverse students and share their opinions of influences on quality WIL experiences, offering a guiding paradigm for future research and policy development to optimize WIL engagement and outcomes. We will ask you to share your experiences of working with students in this space. 5:30 – 6:00 PM Welcome Reception Join us for appetizers and beverages. 6:00 PM Opening Keynote and Dinner CJ Eubanks Fleming, Judene Pretti, Gianna Smurro, and Annelise Weaver present Juggling Perspectives: Students, Supervisors, and Academic Mentors in Work-Integrated Learning 8:00 – 9:00 PM Poster Session and Dessert Reception Engaging and Sustaining Learning in a Gateway Course through Notetaking and Peer Coaching, by Scott Hicks (UNC Pembroke) and Mark Milewicz (UNC Pembroke) Inspired by previous students’ stated desire for academic support and literature that correlates instruction in academic skills with student success, this poster describes an instructional intervention integrating notetaking, study skills, and peer coaches in a lecture-based General Education, gateway course, Introduction to Political Science, at a historically American Indian university. This study demonstrates the intervention’s impact on student success through a correlation to previous exam performance in classes without peer coaches’ assessments of students’ notes, and students’ responses to timely formative feedback. The Role of Authenticity, Engagement, Empowerment, and Reciprocity in Collaboration and Mutuality in Mentoring Relationships, by Sabrina Thurman (Elon University) Mentoring relationships are co-constructed and can involve interdependent bi-directional developmental changes in both the mentee and mentor over time. Here, I explore how those involved in mentoring relationships can enhance collaboration and mutuality through both parties being authentic, mutually engaged, empowered, and reciprocal. I discuss the benefits of grappling with complex issues related to identity, respect, responsibility, power, and healthy emotional vulnerability. Collaboration and mutuality are crucial for fostering environments of engaged learning. Transforming Students into Healthcare Professionals: A Literature Review Exploring the Interrelationships Between Work-Integrated Learning, Belongingness, and Health Professions Students, by Cynthia Bennett (Elon University), Leah M. Stade (University of Nebraska Medical Center), Robin Selzer (University of Cincinnati), Deborah A. O’Connor (Manchester Metropolitan University, UK), Hannah N. Lauck (University of Cincinnati), Cassidy Johnson (University of Nebraska Medical Center), and Simone Regnier (University of Nebraska Medical Center) The concept of belongingness has become a topic of interest in colleges and universities as an addendum to diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI) initiatives. As pre-health and professional program students prepare for careers in health professions, they engage in work-integrated learning (WIL) experiences. These experiences may affect the student’s ability to develop the sense of belongingness. This poster outlines the literature on WIL and belongingness in the health professions, and highlights many findings of the literature. Traversing Underexplored Terrain: Faculty Members’ Support for and Engagement in Work-Integrated Learning, by Letitia Henville (Writing Short is Hard Consulting), Kristin Geraty (North Central College), Denyse Lafrance-Horning (Nipissing University, Canada), and Catherine Wilson Faculty members hold diverse perspectives on work-integrated learning—a diversity that has been underexamined in the literature. We have performed a representative review of the research on faculty members’ support for and engagement in WIL programs. We consider the barriers that faculty encounter when considering supporting or engaging in WIL; provide a deep dive into the substantial research on faculty’s perceptions of, and barriers to participating in, service learning; and share recommendations for future research. What does “Work” mean to First-Generation Students? Emerging Identities in WIL Narratives, by Neil Baird (Bowling Green State University), Christine Kampen Robinson (Canadian Mennonite University, Canada), Mariko Izumi (Columbus State University), and Tim Diette (Hampden-Sydney College) Given lack of consensus in scholarship on first-generation students and work integrated learning, we approach first-generation students through a life design framework, asking how do first-generation students understand work, and what role does their understanding of work play in the negotiation of identities in WIL? Drawing on survey and case study data, our poster presentation shares practical ways to adapt WIL to be sensitive to the needs of first-generation students and their intersecting identities. An International Exploration of Students’ Conceptions of Quality Work-Integrated Learning, by Michelle Eady (University of Wollongong, Australia), David Drewery (University of Waterloo, Canada), Monica Burney (Elon University), and Wincy Li (Toronto Metropolitan University, Canada) As post-secondary institutions offer more diverse forms of work-integrated learning (WIL), there is a greater need to consider meanings of “quality” WIL. Ongoing discussions about quality WIL in the literature mostly overlook students’ perspectives—the central stakeholder in WIL. To address this, we explored students’ perspectives on quality WIL through interviews with students (n = 30) at three institutions, across three countries, representing various kinds of WIL experiences and multiple disciplines. Findings from the study position students’ perspectives at the center of discussions about quality WIL. Supervisor Perspectives on Leadership Behaviours, by Anne-Marie Fannon (University of Waterloo, Canada), Rachel Hains-Wesson (University of Sydney, Australia), and Borghild Brekke Hauglid (Kristiania University College, Norway) Organizations invest significantly in leadership development and training. There is some literature suggesting that supervision of work-integrated learning\ students leads to leadership development in staff (Martin et al, 2019) but this research is quite limited. This poster presentation shares the findings from an international survey of over 300 placement supervisors describing how student supervision affects their leadership behaviours and attitudes. The survey also examined perspectives of supervision on inclusive leadership and the impact of supervision on well-being and satisfaction. Monday, July 15 7:30 – 8:30 AM Breakfast Conference Announcements at 8:00 AM 8:30 – 9:30 AM Concurrent A Sessions A1a. The Psychological Shift: Engaging Economically Insecure Students, by David Gooblar (University of Iowa) [30-minute presentation] The social-class achievement gap is not due solely to a lack of resources; the experience of living in or near poverty itself has psychological effects on our students. This presentation will look at research into the effects of three important psychological cues of a life lived in poverty—scarcity, instability, and stigma. It will lay out how instructors can provide the resources, stability, and educational mission that can counteract those effects and help students succeed. A1b. Towards a Contextualized Perspective of Capability Development: A Landscape of Practice Approach to Graduate Employability, by Behnam (Ben) Soltani (Singapore Institute of Technology) — CANCELLED [30-minute presentation] This paper explores graduate employability using a landscape of practice lens and different methods including narrative frames, ethnographic observations, and interviews. It interprets capability development and identity construction in a work-based Masters program, arguing that learners enhance their employability through community engagement. The paper redefines capability as a social construct, emphasizing participation in community practices and understanding community norms. It concludes that building professional futures involves problem-solving, negotiation, and learning, along with resilience and reflection. A2. Spotlight on Faculty: A Quantitative and Qualitative Investigation of Faculty Engagement in Work-Integrated Learning, by Denyse Lafrance Horning (Nipissing University, Canada), CJ Eubanks Fleming (Elon University), Kristin Gerarty (North Central College), Michelle Eady (University of Wollongong, Australia), Letitia Henville (Writing Short is Hard Consulting), and Catherine Wilson [60-minute presentation] This presentation will include multiple projects that evaluate faculty engagement in the context of work-integrated learning (WIL) as framed by Wade and Demb’s 2009 Faculty Engagement Model. The researchers have surveyed and interviewed faculty at several international institutions to evaluate the personal, professional, and institutional barriers and facilitators to faculty engagement with WIL. Implications for students, faculty, and institutions will be discussed. 9:45 -10:45 AM Concurrent B Sessions B1. Design Strategies for Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity in Engaged Learning through Place, facilitated by Danielle Lake (Elon University), James Shields Jr. (African American Cultural Arts and History Center), Merrie Byers (Elon University), Sandy Marshall (Elon University), and Robert Alvis (Williams High School, Burlington, NC)[60-minute workshop] This workshop shares curricular design strategies and study outcomes from the Power + Place Collaborative: A partnership that centers issues of diversity, inclusion, and equity through place-based community-student projects. Community, student, and faculty facilitators will briefly summarize findings from a longitudinal, mixed methods study documenting the value and the challenges of this approach to engaged learning. Participants will be invited to explore ways they might adapt strategies towards cultivating diverse, inclusive, and equitable engaged learning collaborations across their communities. B2a. Engaging Students in Multimodal Writing with ChatGPT in STEM, by Aaron Trocki (Elon University) [30-minute presentation] Have you ever considered how to purposefully include student use of ChatGPT and what implications there may be on student engagement? In this presentation, we will consider research on a set of multimodal writing assignments that involved students using ChatGPT in support of their investigations and writing. Writing samples and feedback will be examined to assess students’ work and perceptions along three key practices for fostering engaged learning. B2b. How Good of an Assistant is AI? by Goodson Dzenga (University of Montana Western) and Christian Gilde (University of Montana Western)[30-minute presentation] This exploratory work tested how ChatGPT can assist students in creating a product plan for a seed-funded product. The method employed were questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and focus groups by using students after they had utilized ChatGPT. First results indicated that when students used AI they produced more organized and developed product plans. The significance of this research stemmed from utilizing AI as an essential tool to foster engaged learning. B3. “Trust me”: Faculty approaches to building trust with and among students, facilitated by Peter Felten (Elon University), Rachel Forsyth (Lund University, Sweden), and Kathryn Sutherland (Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand)[60-minute workshop] Positive student-faculty and student-student relationships are among the most significant factors contributing to learning, motivation, wellbeing, and graduation rates. Trust is commonly understood as a key element of these relationships, yet little research has been done on trust higher education classrooms. This session draws on interviews with faculty in four countries to explore how they understand and value trust. We will consider the implications of this research for teaching, WIL, and further SoTL inquiries. 11:00 AM – 12:00 PM Concurrent C Sessions C1. Laying Self Bare Using Art: How to Cultivate Self-Reflection Through Artistic Expression, facilitated by Stephanie Hernandez Rivera (Elon University), Emily Moser (Elon University), Logan Morral (Elon University), and Rebecca Osborne (Elon University)[60-minute workshop] The purpose of this session is to underscore how educators can foster reflection of learning and self through creating assignments that engage artistic expression. Participants will gain insight on an assignment where students explored their own personal development through creating an artistic representation of their experiences. Furthermore, participants will identify how they can use projects such as this to support application, analysis, and integration of theory and course content. C2. Strengthening Partnerships in Work-Integrated Learning: A Systematic Literature Review of Challenges and Opportunities for Industry Supervisors, by Rachael Hains-Wesson (University of Sydney, Australia), Anne-Marie Fannon (University of Waterloo, Canada), and Borghild Brekke Hauglid (Kristiania University College, Norway)[60-minute presentation] Enhancing WIL supervisors’ professional development and acknowledging their role is vital for fostering a sustainable knowledge society. This study presents the findings from a large-scale, systematic literature review of 180 English and Norwegian peer-reviewed articles (selected from 9349), exploring challenges faced by industry supervisors overseeing work-integrated learning placements. The findings underscore the necessity for formal training and recognition to empower placement supervisors, enabling them to create inclusive, lasting learning experiences for students. C3. From Anxiety to Empowerment: How AI Fostered Growth and Community in One Semester, facilitated by Kayla Almaguer (Lone Star College)[60-minute workshop] This presentation documents the rapid personal growth and community cultivation enabled by AI educational tools piloted in Fall 2023. Early hesitation gave way to empowerment as intelligent collaboration fostered idea exchange, creative risk-taking, and treasuring process over product. By spotlighting student perspectives on chatbots, the session crystallizes AI’s potential to fuel more inclusive, human-centered classrooms when designed to amplify rather than automate. Attendees will leave inspired by the visions for connection and lifelong learning unlocked through mindful incorporation of machine intelligence. 12:00 – 1:00 PM Lunch Conference Announcements at 12:30 PM 1:00 – 2:00 PM Concurrent D Sessions D1. Inclusive Mentoring of Undergraduate Research for Neurodivergent Students, Facilitated by Caroline Ketcham (Elon University), Eric Hall (Elon University), and Stephen Byrd (Elon University)[60-minute workshop] Mentored undergraduate research is a high-impact and transformative experience for student development and professional outcomes. Mentoring practices must intentionally attend to identity differences among mentors and students. The goal of this session will be to apply a neuroinclusive and neuroaffirming lens to The Ten Salient Practices of Mentoring Undergraduate Research to provide mentors tangible actions to be inclusive of neurodivergent students in undergraduate research experiences. D2a. Design Thinking Strategies for Cultivating Engaged Learning, by Danielle Lake (Elon University), Trinity Barnett (Elon University), and Aidan Spoerndle (Elon University)[30-minute presentation] As Design Thinking has been diversified and refined over recent decades, its use in developing immersive and transformative learning experiences has grown to encompass key aspects of Engaged Learning. This session builds upon Key Practices for Fostering Engaged Learning, summarizing over two decades of Design Thinking literature and four years of research data from Elon’s Center for Design Thinking. The session will provide attendees with research-based strategies for creating the conditions for engaged learning environments. D2b. A Spatial Model of Critical Thinking for the University and Workplace, by Behnam Soltani (Singapore Institute of Technology) and Kenneth Ong (Singapore Institute of Technology) — CANCELLED [30-minute presentation] This paper offers a critical thinking model that could be used by individuals at the university and workplace. Through practical examples, it discusses how individuals can critically analyze the physical space around them, understand existing policies, ideologies, and power relations, and interpret interactions with others. It concludes that the model can present a dynamic, robust, and fair understanding of social space, addressing questions of DEI, and preparing learners for the world of work. D3. How do Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) Experiences Foster Belongingness for Students Learning to Become Healthcare Professionals. Preliminary Results of the BeWIL Study, presented by Cynthia Bennett (Elon University), Leah M. Stade (University of Nebraska Medical Center), Robin Selzer (University of Cincinnati), Deborah A. O’Connor (Manchester Metropolitan University, UK), Hannah N. Lauck (University of Cincinnati), Cassidy Johnson (University of Nebraska Medical Center), and Simone Regnier (University of Nebraska Medical Center)[60-minute presentation] Education for healthcare professionals and pre-health undergraduates commonly involves work-integrated learning (WIL) experiences. One assumption behind integrating WIL is that this immersion will assist in the students’ feelings of belongingness. The BeWIL study explores how WIL fosters belongingness for healthcare students during all stages of their educational journey. This group presentation is an interactive workshop exploring early study findings, the involvement of student partners in the research process, and recommendations for supporting belongingness in WIL settings. 2:15 – 3:15 PM Concurrent E Sessions E1. Engaged Learning Design for Motivation, Comprehension and Application, facilitated by Tianhong Shi (Oregon State University) — CANCELLED [60-minute workshop] This presentation will showcase three course design projects using engaged learning principles to overcome design challenges, including challenging content, lack of student motivation, and difficulty transferring knowledge. Participants will collaboratively apply key principles into one of their courses, followed by individual takeaway sharing, and Question and Answer time. E2. What Does “Work” Mean to First-Generation Students? Emerging Identities in WIL Narratives, by Neil Baird (Bowling Green State University), Christine Kampen Robinson (Canadian Mennonite University, Canada), Mariko Izumi (Columbus State University), and Tim Diette (Hampden-Sydney College)[60-minute workshop] Given lack of consensus in scholarship on first-generation students and work integrated learning, we approach first-generation students through a life design framework, asking how do first-generation students understand work, and what role does their definition of work play in the negotiation of identities in WIL? Drawing on survey and case study data, our group research presentation shares practical ways to adapt WIL to be sensitive to the needs of first-generation students and their intersecting identities. E3a. Beyond the Grade: Labor-Based Assessment in Community Engaged Classes, by Kate Stephenson (University of Virginia)[30-minute presentation] Assessment in community engaged courses proves challenging because what students learn often lies outside the margins of the typical academic project. Labor-based grading can provide a more equitable system for offering feedback. The presentation will include examples of rubrics, project feedback, and student evaluations as well as conclusions about the improved quality in student work, alternative ways to reward excellence, and the increased role of community partners in assessment. 3:30 – 4:30 PM Closing Keynote with Karsten Zegwaard View Professor Zegwaard’s Slides