Amanda Sturgill, associate professor of journalism, is the 2024-2026 CEL Scholar. Her work focuses on the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and engaged learning in higher education. Dr. Sturgill also previously contributed posts on global learning as a seminar leader for the 2015-2017 research seminar on Integrating Global Learning with the University Experience.

"If the AI output replaces the human input, the human's value comes into question." -Amanda Sturgill

The Human in the Loop: Considerations for Generative AI in Academia 

There’s a concept I’ve seen in many papers investigating generative AI (genAI) in education—the human in the loop. It’s important enough that Anthropic, makers of Claude, include it in their usage policy, stating, “When using our products or services to provide advice, recommendations, or in subjective…

"If I must incorporate AI support, and doing so makes my job more routine, I risk losing something I value." -Amanda Sturgill

Might AI Assistance Take the Joy Out of Learning? 

There are different origins and interpretations of what liberal education means, but a favorite of mine is the idea that a liberal education liberates. You gain the ability to think critically and to know how to learn, which liberates you to learn other things, enabling you to act in line with your values. Generative AI (GenAI) tools have…

Two people wholding phone with facial recognition activated. Quote: "consider how these tools might be used in a culturally responsive and accountable way that selects for equity rather than settling for exclusion.”

Generative AI and Non-Majority Students: Risks and Benefits 

Generative AI offers both potential and limitations for minoritized and disabled students. Recent publications show a clear tension: these tools can expand—making access and participation a reality for some learners who might have been excluded.  At the same time, generative tools have the potential to strengthen the very…

Digital illustration of woman looking at map with robot grid. text reads: "Relying on generative AI information could have bad physical and social ramifications for community-based learning.”

AI Hallucinations Matter for More Than Academic Integrity 

I had to chuckle over this quote in a May New York Times article: “Though they are useful in some situations—like writing term papers, summarizing office documents and generating computer code—their mistakes can cause problems.” I think many of my fellow academics would see…

Hand pointint at blue light screen that says automation with quote text "as humans delegate tasks to machines, it might be a source of more ethical lapses...”

Generative AI and Professional Ethics 

I am a professor of journalism, and it’s a challenging time to make the case for why journalism still matters. I give my students a couple of reasons: first is the ability to access and make sense of a variety…

Robot and person fist bumping. Text: "AI can take on that work, and no human helpers are needed. The project gets done, but some of the lessons don't get learned." -Amanda Sturgill

Tell the Robot How You Feel About Learning 

In many ways, AI assistance can be helpful with writing, but one that has never made sense to me is asking AI to help formulate an opinion. I occasionally see this from students when I ask them what they think…

Glowing blue pen hovering above notebook. White quote text: "As educators, we need to be re-examining the borders between “learn” and “do” and how we might scaffold both in the age of generative AI.”

Blue Books and In-Class Writing Are Not a Panacea 

In comments sections and replies in both educator spaces and mass media articles, it’s common to see exhortations to simply return to an earlier time where students demonstrated knowledge in class. I myself recall needing to remember to stop by…