Making College “Worth It” – Season 3, Episode 3

In this episode, we explore the technical, ethical, and social complexities of using AI in engineering. We speak with Dr. Blake Hament, Assistant Professor of Engineering at Elon University, who shares an example of developing a voice-enabled robotic guide dog in close collaboration with members of the visually-impaired community. Our conversation also examines the long history of AI in engineering, illustrating that GenAI is an updated application of a longstanding technology.

View a transcript of this episode.

Meet our Guest

Professor Blake Hament is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Elon University. He received a B.S. in Physics from Duke University and served as a research assistant at the European Center for Nuclear Research (CERN). After his undergraduate studies, Blake joined Teach for America, served as a robotics coach, and earned his M.Ed. in Science Education from University of Nevada, Las Vegas. He earned his Ph.D. with the Mechanical Engineering Department at University of Nevada, Las Vegas while conducting R&D with companies like Tesla, Lockheed Martin, Boston Dynamics, and local aerospace and robotics startups. Blake was awarded a US Congressional Commendation and a US Department of Transportation Outstanding Student of the Year award for these contributions. At Elon, Blake has been working to build bridges with other disciplines, with projects like Musical Theatre Robotics and UAV for Stormwater Sampling. 

Episode Credits

This episode is co-hosted by Jessie L. Moore, Director of Elon University’s Center for Engaged Learning, and Nolan Schultheis, a third-year student at Elon University, studying Psychology with an interest in law. Nolan Schultheis also edited the episode.

Episode art was created by Nolan Schultheis and Jennie Goforth. 

Funky Percussions is by Denys Kyshchuk (@audiocoffeemusic) – https://www.audiocoffee.net/. Soft Beat is by ComaStudio. 

Making College “Worth It” is produced by Elon University’s Center for Engaged Learning. 

Explore Resources Related to The Episode

Keefe, Amalie J., and Blake Hament. 2024. “Artificial Intelligence (AI) Voice Module for Robotic Service Dog.” IEEE Xplore 2024 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS). https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS61124.2024.10534692

Dr. Hament’s Google Scholar page – https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=CQNe4WcAAAAJ&hl=en

Icon of a head surrounded by other icons like a gear, a magnifying glass, and an email. Text overlay reads, "CEL Podcasts. 60-Second SoTL. Exploring GenAI’s Potential as a SoTL Partner"

Exploring GenAI’s Potential as a SoTL Partner

60-Second SoTL – Episode 76 What might it look like to treat generative AI as a partner in scholarship of teaching and learning? This episode features an open-access article that examines how SoTL scholars can integrate large language models—tools like ChatGPT, Claude,…

"If the AI output replaces the human input, the human's value comes into question." -Amanda Sturgill

The Human in the Loop: Considerations for Generative AI in Academia 

There’s a concept I’ve seen in many papers investigating generative AI (genAI) in education—the human in the loop. It’s important enough that Anthropic, makers of Claude, include it in their usage policy, stating, “When using our products or services to provide advice, recommendations, or in subjective…

"If I must incorporate AI support, and doing so makes my job more routine, I risk losing something I value." -Amanda Sturgill

Might AI Assistance Take the Joy Out of Learning? 

There are different origins and interpretations of what liberal education means, but a favorite of mine is the idea that a liberal education liberates. You gain the ability to think critically and to know how to learn, which liberates you to learn other things, enabling you to act in line with your values. Generative AI (GenAI) tools have…

Two people wholding phone with facial recognition activated. Quote: "consider how these tools might be used in a culturally responsive and accountable way that selects for equity rather than settling for exclusion.”

Generative AI and Non-Majority Students: Risks and Benefits 

Generative AI offers both potential and limitations for minoritized and disabled students. Recent publications show a clear tension: these tools can expand—making access and participation a reality for some learners who might have been excluded.  At the same time, generative tools have the potential to strengthen the very…

A cartoon robot on a desktop computer screen with a voice balloon with the text, "I'm Nudgy. How can I nudge your thinking today." Text overlays read, "CEL Podcasts. 60-Second SoTL. Student Engagement with GenAI Brainstorming."

Student Engagement with GenAI Brainstorming

60-Second SoTL – Episode 71 How can generative AI support student brainstorming without replacing thinking, voice, or agency? This episode highlights an open-access article about a GenAI-enabled brainstorming app used in an interdisciplinary writing course: Chia, Joanne, and Angela Frattarola. 2025….