Making College “Worth It” – Season 3, Episode 1

In this episode we explore how generative AI is influencing current writing pedagogies in higher education. We speak with Dr. Mandy Olejnik, Assistant Director of Writing Across the Curriculum at Miami University of Ohio. Our conversation focuses on the impact GenAI has had on the assignment creation process.

View the transcript for this episode.

Meet our Guest

Dr. Mandy Olejnik is Assistant Director of Writing Across the Curriculum at Miami University’s Howe Center for Writing Excellence (HCWE), where she supports disciplinary faculty and graduate instructors in their teaching of writing. She leads all AI faculty development programming at the Center, including the AI-Informed Writing Pedagogy Certificate. She co-edited the 2022 collection Changing Conceptions, Changing Practices: Innovating Teaching Across Disciplines and is co-editor of the contracted and forthcoming edited collection Bad Ideas about AI and Writing: Toward Generative Practices for Teaching, Learning, and Communication. Her research has also appeared in The WAC Journal, Across the Disciplines, Composition Forum, Xchanges, and Transformative Works and Cultures. In her free time, she enjoys classic ballroom dancing, gardening, and learning about personal finance. 

Episode Credits

This episode is co-hosted by Jessie L. Moore, Director of Elon University’s Center for Engaged Learning, and Nolan Schultheis, a third-year student at Elon University, studying Psychology with an interest in law. Nolan Schultheis also edited the episode. Making College “Worth It” is produced by Elon University’s Center for Engaged Learning. 

Episode art was created by Nolan Schultheis and Jennie Goforth. 

Funky Percussions is by Denys Kyshchuk (@audiocoffeemusic) – https://www.audiocoffee.net/. Soft Beat is by ComaStudio. 

Explore Resources Related to The Episode

Olejnik, Mandy. (2023, December 8). “AI Won’t Replace Writing Instruction (Opinion).” Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2023/12/08/ai-wont-replace-writing-instruction-opinion 

AI Literacy and Higher Education Instructors 

Is it time to teach kindergarteners prompt engineering, yet? This New York Times article is about grade school education, but I thought the subhead was telling: “Artificial intelligence companies are urging teachers to prepare students for an ‘A.I. -driven future.’ What that means varies from…

Exploring GenAI’s Potential as a SoTL Partner

60-Second SoTL – Episode 76 What might it look like to treat generative AI as a partner in scholarship of teaching and learning? This episode features an open-access article that examines how SoTL scholars can integrate large language models—tools like ChatGPT, Claude,…

The Human in the Loop: Considerations for Generative AI in Academia 

There’s a concept I’ve seen in many papers investigating generative AI (genAI) in education—the human in the loop. It’s important enough that Anthropic, makers of Claude, include it in their usage policy, stating, “When using our products or services to provide advice, recommendations, or in subjective…

Might AI Assistance Take the Joy Out of Learning? 

There are different origins and interpretations of what liberal education means, but a favorite of mine is the idea that a liberal education liberates. You gain the ability to think critically and to know how to learn, which liberates you to learn other things, enabling you to act in line with your values. Generative AI (GenAI) tools have…

Generative AI and Non-Majority Students: Risks and Benefits 

Generative AI offers both potential and limitations for minoritized and disabled students. Recent publications show a clear tension: these tools can expand—making access and participation a reality for some learners who might have been excluded.  At the same time, generative tools have the potential to strengthen the very…