Making College “Worth It” – Season 3, Episode 1

In this episode we explore how generative AI is influencing current writing pedagogies in higher education. We speak with Dr. Mandy Olejnik, Assistant Director of Writing Across the Curriculum at Miami University of Ohio. Our conversation focuses on the impact GenAI has had on the assignment creation process.

View the transcript for this episode.

Meet our Guest

Dr. Mandy Olejnik is Assistant Director of Writing Across the Curriculum at Miami University’s Howe Center for Writing Excellence (HCWE), where she supports disciplinary faculty and graduate instructors in their teaching of writing. She leads all AI faculty development programming at the Center, including the AI-Informed Writing Pedagogy Certificate. She co-edited the 2022 collection Changing Conceptions, Changing Practices: Innovating Teaching Across Disciplines and is co-editor of the contracted and forthcoming edited collection Bad Ideas about AI and Writing: Toward Generative Practices for Teaching, Learning, and Communication. Her research has also appeared in The WAC Journal, Across the Disciplines, Composition Forum, Xchanges, and Transformative Works and Cultures. In her free time, she enjoys classic ballroom dancing, gardening, and learning about personal finance. 

Episode Credits

This episode is co-hosted by Jessie L. Moore, Director of Elon University’s Center for Engaged Learning, and Nolan Schultheis, a third-year student at Elon University, studying Psychology with an interest in law. Nolan Schultheis also edited the episode. Making College “Worth It” is produced by Elon University’s Center for Engaged Learning. 

Episode art was created by Nolan Schultheis and Jennie Goforth. 

Funky Percussions is by Denys Kyshchuk (@audiocoffeemusic) – https://www.audiocoffee.net/. Soft Beat is by ComaStudio. 

Explore Resources Related to The Episode

Olejnik, Mandy. (2023, December 8). “AI Won’t Replace Writing Instruction (Opinion).” Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2023/12/08/ai-wont-replace-writing-instruction-opinion 

Navigating the Moral GenAI Panic

60-Second SoTL – Episode 93 What happens when we move beyond GenAI panic—and focus instead on helping students learn to use these tools ethically and effectively? This episode highlights Jennifer Krebsbach and Victoria Cross’s study of student learning in a…

AI-Supported Feedback Uptake

60-Second SoTL – Episode 92 How might educators use AI to support students’ interpretation and uptake of feedback? In this episode, Jessie shares a recent mixed-methods study about student perceptions of AI’s potential to support learners’ reflection on and engagement…

GenAI Can Make Some Tasks Easier. But At What Cost?  

Back during the pandemic, instructors were all sent home to teach online. Many had no training or experience with this modality. As I realized I needed to accommodate students who had spread to multiple time zones and home responsibilities, asynchronous…

GenAI in Higher Education: Embrace, Deny, or Somewhere In Between 

My continued involvement with the Center of Engaged Learning at Elon University has led to my current role as a co-leader of the 2026-2028 Research Seminar on Rethinking Engaged Learning in the Age of GenAI. I am writing this blog…

The Affordances and Risks of Generative AI for Training Undergraduate Researchers 

Undergraduate research is credited with helping students develop cognitive abilities along with an understanding of the way that research happens, among other benefits, when done well. Some characteristics of high-quality undergraduate research include working on unsolved research problems (Bhattacharyya, Chan, and Waraczynski 2018) working closely with faculty  having some autonomy in the research decisions (Gilmore et…