Limed: Teaching with a Twist – Episode 11

In this episode of Limed: Teaching with a Twist, Matt Wittstein follows up with Mark Burnham from Season 1, Episode 8, “Demonstrating Knowledge Using Oral Assessments.” Matt and Mark discuss Mark’s experience with implementing oral exams in his Biology coursework, the feedback and reactions he gauged from his students, and his future plans with oral assessments and other non-traditional methods of assessment in the classroom.

View a transcript of this episode.

This episode was hosted by Matt Wittstein, edited by Jeremiah Timberlake, and produced by Matt Wittstein in collaboration with the Center for Engaged Learning.

About the Guest

Headshot of Mark Burnham

Mark Burnham is an assistant professor of biology and environmental science at Emory & Henry College in Emory, VA. He is an ecologist and does most of his teaching in introductory level biology and environmental studies as well as ecology and botany. Outside of teaching, Mark is involved with the E&H garden, greenhouse, and herbarium. He researches nitrogen and carbon biogeochemical cycling in natural and managed ecosystems, and his new research program at E&H includes studying the ecology and sustainability of small gardens in Southwest Virginia. Although he’s not really an entomologist, he is currently building and curating an insect collection on campus. You can learn more about Mark on his website and also find his live bird feeder stream online: Appalachian Bird Cam on YouTube!

Listen to the Original Episode

A faculty member and a student sit on opposite sides of a table, engaged in conversation.

Demonstrating Knowledge Using Oral Assessments

Limed: Teaching with a Twist – Episode 8 Mark Burnham wants to help his students get more practice and feel psychologically more prepared for their oral graduation examinations in Emerson and Henry College’s biology program. He is already planning to…

Resources Related to this Episode

  • Elon University Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning. “Assessing Student Learning.
  • “Guidelines for Oral Assessments and Exams.” Office of Teaching and Learning. University of Guelph. Accessed April 10, 2023. https://otl.uoguelph.ca/guidelines-oral-assessments-and-exams.
  • Moon, Jennifer A. A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. Routledge, 2013.
  • Pipe, Laura May, and Jennifer T. Stephens. 2021. “Toward a Liberated Learning Spirit: A Model for Developing Critical Consciousness.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 21 (2): 121-139. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v21i2.29148 [Open Access]

Additional Resources from the Center’s Blog and Podcasts

Two women look at computer screen while another is on her own computer. "Students are ready to step up to the challenges of using generative AI if they are provided appropriate guidance”

Utilizing a Framework for Artificial Intelligence-Supported Assessments: Part 2

In December I introduced a framework to support faculty with the complexities of incorporating generative AI into their assessments. One feature of this framework encourages the consideration of separating assessment components into AI-active and AI-inactive sections to better articulate expectations…

An image featuring a photo of the cover of Grading for Growth by David Clark and Robert Talbert. The image is labeled as Center for Engaged Learning Book Review. A pull quote from reviewers Eric Hall and Kristina Meinking says the following: Grading for Growth offers a refreshing blend of theory and practice with its process-based, user-oriented, and realistic framing for change and experimentation.

Keep It Simple: Strategies for Adopting Alternative Grading Practices to Enhance Student Learning

Clark, David and Robert Talbert. 2023. Grading for Growth: A Guide to Alternative Grading Practices That Promote Authentic Learning and Student Engagement in Higher Education. New York: Routledge. Grades and grading have long plagued students and instructors alike. Faculty frequently…

A photo containing a visual of a robot arm with the following quotation: The preliminary data analyzed about using this framework shows some promise for its effectiveness to encourage faculty and students to use generative AI in productive and educative ways.

Utilizing a Framework for Artificial Intelligence-Supported Assessments: Part 1

In my previous blog post, I introduced a framework developed to assist faculty with incorporating generative AI, such as ChatGPT, in their assessments. I also shared an artificial intelligence-supported assessment (AI-SA) and some of my thinking underlying its structure and…

Someone types on a laptop keyboard. Only their hands are visible. Pens and a mug are to the left of the laptop. Overlays read, "CEL Podcast. 60-Second SoTL. Measuring What Learners Do with Feedback."

Measuring What Learners Do With Feedback

60-Second SoTL – Episode 47 This episode shares an open-access article from Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education and explores how to measure feedback literacy in higher education: Dawson, Phillip, Zi Yan, Anastasiya Lipnevich, Joanna Tai, David Boud, and Paige Mahoney. 2023. “Measuring What Learners Do in Feedback: The Feedback Literacy Behaviour Scale.” Assessment…

A time-lapse photo shows thousands of wavy lines of yellow and white light on a black background. Text overlay reads “How might faculty use AI to make connections among concepts and applications and to unbundle their assessments to promote student growth?”

A Preliminary Framework for Artificial Intelligence–Supported Assessments: Models of Assessment and Feedback

Since interviewing Rachel Forsyth a couple months ago, I have been writing and piloting assessments that incorporate artificial intelligence platforms like ChatGPT. My work was in response to her consideration of how AI could be used to help students and…