Book cover design for TILTed Pedagogy with black text and green transparent background with diagonal lines.

When teaching a course that fulfills a general education requirement, it is often a challenge to illicit interest among all students in the course content since each student may enroll in the course for different reasons. This chapter shares a readily adaptable two-part assignment designed to give students choice and autonomy in assessment with an “Introduction to Popular Culture” course. The assignment includes both original creative work and a piece of reflective writing to enable students to think of their work holistically rather than as separate processes. I base this assignment in the Universal Design for Learning (UDL), creative assignments, and reflection literature.

Related Book Resources

I have included two resources that I have developed that can be integrated directly with this assignment.

  • Reflection Worksheet 1 [PDF] [Word] | The first is a revision of the reflective portion of the assignment in the form of a worksheet, in the hopes of engaging students who respond more easily to a structured reflection process.
  • Reflection Worksheet 2 [PDF] [Word] | The second is a potential addition to this process in the form of a (reflective) peer review worksheet; the combination of reflective writing and peer review allows students to engage with multiple perspectives simultaneously, while also positioning them as expert readers in their own right.

There are also a number of excellent resources available only for developing creative assignments in the classroom. One that I particularly like comes from Columbia University’s Center for Teaching and Learning and includes an extensive bibliography (Creative Assignments Resources). There are also a lot of good resources on reflection in the classroom, with practical suggestions and research; my go-to is from Purdue University’s OWL (Reflective Writing in Teaching Resources).

Discussion Questions

  • What teaching challenge is the chapter’s assignment trying to address, and how does that challenge show up in your own courses? 
  • How does the chapter’s use of the TILT framework (purpose, task, criteria) change the learning experience described, and what parallels do you see in your own teaching? 
  • What assumptions about students or learning does the chapter surface, and how might those assumptions influence assignment design? 
  • How does the assignment described in the chapter support student agency, autonomy, or choice? 
  • How does the chapter illustrate the connection between assignment design and deeper learning (e.g., critical thinking, metacognition, synthesis)? 
  • What evidence does the chapter provide that the assignment worked, and what additional evidence would you want to see? 
  • How does the chapter’s assignment align with or challenge your current beliefs about effective assessment? 
  • What aspects of the assignment design could be adapted to your discipline, and what would need to change? 
  • If you were to implement a version of this chapter’s assignment, what would be your first step—and what potential barriers would you anticipate?